Ipswich Unemployed Action.

Campaigning for Unemployed Rights.

Labour’s Policy on Universal Credit: from “Fix it” to Change the Whole System.

Related image

What Labour is up against.

Labour’s policy on Universal Credit, 

“The Tories’ Universal Credit programme is pushing thousands of families into poverty, debt and homelessness.

We’re demanding the Tories urgently pause and fix Universal Credit, before millions more are affected.

Say you’re with us.

Now some may say that calling on the Government to ‘fix’ Universal Credit is not much of a policy.
This is some more detail, (from November, Guardian).

Labour has unveiled a list of demands to improve the rollout of universal credit, seeking to keep up the pressure on Philip Hammond over the issue before Wednesday’s budget.

The shadow pensions secretary, Debbie Abrahams, has written to the chancellor demanding changes to UC, which Labour and other critics say is putting people in debt as it is rolled out into new parts of the country.

The main request is to reduce the initial six-week wait for a payment under the system, which is designed to replace a range of other benefits such as tax credits and housing benefit.

Charities working with claimants have said the six-week wait tends to put people into arrears, especially with their rent, and means they have to seek support from food banks. There has been speculation the government is planning to reduce this period.

Abrahams is also seeking an option of fortnightly rather than monthly payments, a change to the assessment period and modifications to ensure that the benefit always rewards people for finding more work.

In a separate article for the Guardian, Abrahams said there was increasing evidence that UC “is not fit for purpose – and Labour believes the budget is a chance to fix it”.

The original aims of the system – to simplify social security support, ensure people were always better off in work than on benefits and reduce child poverty – were laudable, and had been supported by Labour, Abrahams wrote.

“But UC is failing to deliver on its objectives, as we have heard from respected charities including Child Poverty Action Group, Trussell Trust, Citizens Advice and Gingerbread. Even former government advisers, civil servants and UC’s own architects are now critical of the scheme,” she added.

The system’s inherent problems were made worse by benefit cuts imposed in 2015, she added.

“As it is being rolled out, universal credit is pushing people into debt and rent arrears, with many people in social and private rented housing being served eviction notices.”

As well as the six-week initial wait, and obligatory monthly payment, Abrahams highlighted UC’s lack of responsiveness to the changes in income of self-employed people.

“The problem is that this is assessed on a monthly basis, with no discretion for the natural peaks and troughs of self-employed work, or indeed for the niceties of the occasional holiday,” she wrote.

“Should they take a Christmas break, many self-employed people may suddenly find they have not met the [Department for Work and Pensions] work requirements, and be sanctioned as a result.

“If you’re thinking this doesn’t affect you, I’m sorry to say that might change, with the government planning to roll out ‘in-work conditionality’. This would require people who are working to report to the jobcentre and demonstrate they are seeking more hours, or face their UC support being cut.”

Most serious, Abrahams warned, were cuts to benefit levels, citing a forecast from the Child Poverty Action Group that reductions to UC would put a million more children into poverty by 2022.

Hammond could begin to fix the situation in the budget, Abrahams said, by reducing the six-week wait, allowing rent to be paid directly to landlords, allowing payments to be split between partners, improving flexibility for self-employed claimants and restoring the cuts to work allowances.

“Anything less won’t make UC fit for today’s labour market,” she wrote. “Anything less will sentence a million more children to be brought up in poverty. Anything less will mean that this prime minister’s promise to tackle ‘burning injustices’ is no more than empty rhetoric.”

This is some good work Debbie Abrahams is doing now.

 But this Blog, being this Blog, would like to see more:

 

  • We need an end to the Benefit Freeze. Anybody going shopping knows prices are rising, as our bills also show.  Housing Benefit should meet costs. We need a Pay Rise!
  • We need an end to the way private chancers and ‘charities’, companies who run the ‘Unemployment Business”, of the likes of the Shaw Trust, Reed In Partnership, Ingeus, Remploy, are now going to take charge of the Work and Health Programme. Carillion indicates how these state contracted firms operate a poor service giant Ponzi schemes, pyramid  sub-contacting is the least of it – for the profits and salaries of their bosses.
  • We need an end to the system by which those on benefits have to pay a percentage of Council Tax. This obligation, introduced by Eric Pickles in 2013, means people pay different rates up and down the country, and was never compensated by a rise in out benefits. From this cut in our income there has come a rise in the numbers in Council Tax arrears.
  • We need an end to any form of Workfare, something people suggest may come up again in the Work and Health Programme.
  • The Sanctions Regime must be abolished.

Food Banks and homelessness should not be seen as permanent features of our society.

We want a decent standard of living, housing, and dignity, for all.

56 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Reblogged this on sdbast.

    sdbast

    January 25, 2018 at 12:42 pm

  2. I’d love to live within Festers means. I’m currently on sick leave from work doing 3 jobs with stress related illness. I’m lucky I get paid to be sick.And please don’t think I’m copping out. I’d rather be at work than feeling this shitty…

    katrehman

    January 25, 2018 at 1:37 pm

  3. I totally agree with this, Universal Credit was a nasty, cruel system from the first. More concerned with punishment and control of the claimant than anything else. And absolutely agree on the extra points you raise.
    End the benefits freeze, get rid of these parasite workfare organisations and their nasty schemes. Stop the sanctions system which has caused so much suffering. Put an end to chasing people for unpaid Council Tax while they are on benefits. And all credit to Debbie Abrahams for keeping up the pressure against Universal Credit. While so often the Labour Party ‘leadership’ has gone for the soft option of a few small changes.

    Jeff Smith

    January 25, 2018 at 2:24 pm

  4. Guardian, Thursday 25th of February,

    Universal credit: what is it and what exactly is wrong with it

    So can we expect further changes to universal credit?
    The key policy question facing each of the four work and pensions secretaries (and myriad policy wonk round tables) since 2015 has been: do we scrap universal credit? So far, politicians have not wanted to pull the plug – the billions pumped into universal credit and the huge amount of political capital and credibility invested in it have been hugely persuasive. So is it too big to fail? The recently departed permanent secretary at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), Robert Devereux, who oversaw universal credit between 2011 and 2018 suggests it is too well-established to reverse. Yet it has influential enemies, from the Treasury (which has always opposed the project) to the chair of the works and pensions select committee, Frank Field. The DWP has to present a renewed business case to the Treasury later this year. If it cannot prove universal credit is working, or delivering savings (and the OBR suggests this is currently far from clear) this may be problematic. It may not sink universal credit, but more changes are likely.

    What might trigger further changes?
    The OBR assessment of universal credit this week pointed out that the project remains fundamentally volatile, not least because – without changes – relatively large numbers of claimants are likely to lose out as the system rolls out across the country. These include: working families claiming tax credits; disabled claimants who stand to lose disability premiums when they move from legacy benefits, and self-employed workers. All three groups have been affected negatively by budget changes that have been subsequently reversed after public outcry. The intention under universal credit to force up to a million low-paid workers to seek more hours or move to higher-paid jobs, under threat of financial sanctions (“in-work conditionality”) is another unexploded bomb. Big changes, however, will require substantial investment.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/25/universal-credit-benefits-scheme-iain-duncan-smith

    Andrew Coates

    January 25, 2018 at 4:59 pm

  5. Universal Credit, it’s all about forcing people to do what they don’t want with sanctions.

    Maz

    January 26, 2018 at 1:28 am

    • While i don’t discount what you say Maz, your find the creepy approach is a subtle one known as Nudge theory and why its often impossible to level a charge of forced.
      Basically they are going around the houses to achieve the same result, that being you doing what they want but in a manner that does not negate choice. The problem is however that the choices aren’t really choices when the odds in one choice are stacked against the other.

      Whats particularly interesting in the case of the new welfare and its reform as opposed to say the auto enrollment of sharing personal medical data, is that its follies of practice still require a stick attached. This is why although it cant be leveled directly, can be seen without a shadow of doubt as a method derived from force rather than altruistic attitude.

      Put another way todays government,its creators and supporters are saying, ” we only care to a point, a point of what we (as in them) want, a point as far as we can get away with, within the confines of law or those we are allowed to make and be accepted.

      doug

      January 26, 2018 at 11:53 am

  6. If you lot had half a brain you lot would be launching scammy bitcoins and shit and rolling in your own filthy lucre. Instead you sit outside the jobcentre pigpen with your begging bowls. I will give you a clue Coates – CoatesCoin – it’s going too the moon 🙂

    Hoggy

    January 26, 2018 at 9:01 am


  7. When you control the language of the debate you control the debate.

    Politcally Incorrect

    January 26, 2018 at 9:07 am

  8. Reblogged this on seachranaidhe1.

    seachranaidhe1

    January 26, 2018 at 11:47 am

  9. Universal Credit is part of agenda 21/30/NWO,labour and the rest of the sorry bunch can pretend to oppose it till they are blue in the face as the tory scum will not scrap it because the evil fucks who control most of this planet won’t allow it!

    Foxglove

    January 26, 2018 at 1:12 pm

    • What do you expect living on planet Rothschild.

      Violet

      January 26, 2018 at 1:30 pm

  10. Hundreds trapped in Universal Credit rent crisis

    Almost 1,500 residents are trapped in a rent arrears crisis caused by the government’s controversial changes to the universal credit system.

    https://www.wigantoday.net/news/politics/hundreds-trapped-in-universal-credit-rent-crisis-1-8982095

    ken

    January 26, 2018 at 1:15 pm

  11. Misery caused by Universal Credit has all been for nothing

    It is a policy which has caused widespread misery – and has plunged a million children into poverty.

    But Universal Credit (UC) has been revealed as a failed project which might not even save the taxpayer any cash.

    A bombshell report from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) shows that the UK Tory government’s flagship welfare reform policy is set to deliver marginal – at best – savings

    http://thirdforcenews.org.uk/tfn-news/misery-caused-by-universal-credit-has-all-been-for-nothing

    ken

    January 26, 2018 at 1:17 pm

    • The OBR added that it was too early to say whether claims made by ministers that universal credit was working – because it had successfully persuaded claimants to move into work or to work more hours – were correct, saying there was “insufficient evidence to judge”.

      whoknew

      January 26, 2018 at 3:25 pm

      • “.. persuaded claimants to move into work or to work more hours…”

        More like bullied, browbeat, threatened and conned, surely. Using a word like “persuaded” makes it seem like claimants can choose to do what they are told or not as they please. This is bullshit. Just ask any of the millions sanctioned most often for trivial mistakes.

        Yea, Unto and Forever

        January 26, 2018 at 7:02 pm

  12. Ex-staffer sues UK’s DWP, claims superior blabbed confidential medical info
    Manchester man seeks £50k damages for alleged data leak

    A Manchester man is suing his former employer, the UK’s largest government department, claiming “highly private” information was divulged to his workmates.

    Aftab Marchant is reportedly seeking £50,000 in damages from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) for distress and personal injury caused by what he describes as a breach of data protection and privacy laws.

    https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/26/dwp_sued_for_email_data_breach_personal_info/

    ken

    January 26, 2018 at 1:19 pm

  13. Britains growing homelessness crisis.

    Violet

    January 26, 2018 at 1:37 pm

    • Yep mate nothing is being done,the only help the so called charities for the homeless know is how to help themselves to all the money they are given for the homeless(I’d call that fucking fraud)! Scum the lot of them!

      Foxglove

      January 26, 2018 at 7:18 pm

  14. “What can I do?” Tony 72 is living in a tent in Milton Keynes.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-42781377

    Violet

    January 26, 2018 at 1:44 pm

  15. Andrew Coates

    January 26, 2018 at 4:08 pm

  16. Sounds good to me, a universal basic income would see everyone getting money regardless of whether they have a job or not and would do away with the cruel benefit system (☺️)!

    Violet

    January 26, 2018 at 7:49 pm

    • But Violet, dear EVERY MAN, WOMAN, CHILD and their DOG has an extra £73.10 knicker a week slushing around in their pocket. What do you think will be the effect of the purchasing value of your CURRENT £73.10? A BETTER system has been proposed. It GUARANTEES the jobless their dole, housing WITHOUT the cruel benefit system. UBI for dolies 🙂 This UBI is a SCAM. It is up their with Bitcoin, Maxcoin, StaceyCoin and Shitcoin 😀

      Max and Stacey Keiser

      January 27, 2018 at 3:29 am

      • UBI for everyone not just dolies you plank 😬

        Violet

        January 27, 2018 at 3:49 pm

      • All these trials of universal basic income are being conducted on UNEMPLOYED people i.e. JSA without the ‘conditionality’

        “In a speck of a village deep in the Finnish countryside, a man gets money for free. Each month, almost €560 (£500) is dropped into his bank account, with no strings attached. The cash is his to use as he wants. Who is his benefactor? The Helsinki government. The prelude to a thriller, perhaps, or some reality TV. But Juha Järvinen’s story is ultimately more exciting. He is a human lab rat in an experiment that could help to shape the future of the west.

        Last Christmas, Järvinen was selected by the state as one of 2,000 unemployed people for a trial of universal basic income.”

        If UBI ever comes to fruition you are going to find that it comes with strings attached i.e conditionality for the unemployed. The ‘basic’ UBI’ won’t be worth £jack-shit, you short piece of wood.

        Hyacynth

        January 28, 2018 at 7:31 am

      • There are only TWO things to consider if you are unemployed as regards UBI 1) ‘conditionality’ Will you still be answerable to a government bureaucracy? 2) The purchasing power of whatever you have to live on. Will UBI free you of ‘conditionality’? 2) (Given that everyone will receive the equivalent of JSA) do you think that you will be worse off, better off, or the same in terms of purchasing power? Will your standard of living go up, down or stay the same?

        Hyacynth

        January 28, 2018 at 7:38 am

      • You are also thinking that UBI will replace JSA/UC.

        “The concept of a universal basic income revolves around the idea of offering every individual, regardless of existing welfare benefits or earned income, a non-conditional flat-rate payment, with any income earned above that taxed progressively.”

        So, UBI is in ADDITION to JSA/UC.

        https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/01/universal-basic-income-trials-being-considered-in-scotland

        Hyacynth

        January 28, 2018 at 7:47 am

    • And in any case it would be perfectly possible to pay benefits just like a PENSION. You don’t see pensioners queuing down the jobcentre every fortnight, do you? You do not NEED jobcentres!

      Max and Stacey Keiser

      January 27, 2018 at 3:33 am

      • I agree we don’t need rotten job centres or should I say (cheka).

        Violet

        January 28, 2018 at 1:27 pm

    • UNIVERSAL BASIC SERVICES

      Universal Basic Services (UBS) are a collection of 7 free public services that enable every
      citizen to live a larger life by ensuring access to safety, opportunity, and participation.
      We repurpose the idea of public services to look at the feasibility of extending the same
      principles of universal access, free at the point of need, which we already manifest in our
      National Health Service, our public education, our democracy, and our legal services (albeit
      with variable quality). To the 3 existing public services we add Shelter, Food, Transport and
      Information. In some fashion these have been, or are, delivered as limited public services,
      but to reap the maximum returns all of these need to be elevated to more fully fledged Basic
      Services.

      Click to access universal_basic_services_-_the_institute_for_global_prosperity_.pdf

      Max and Stacey Keiser

      January 27, 2018 at 3:44 am

    • UNIVERSAL BASIC SERVICES

      Universal Basic Services (UBS) are a collection of 7 free public services that enable every
      citizen to live a larger life by ensuring access to safety, opportunity, and participation.
      We repurpose the idea of public services to look at the feasibility of extending the same principles of universal access, free at the point of need, which we already manifest in our National Health Service, our public education, our democracy, and our legal services (albeit with variable quality). To the 3 existing public services we add Shelter, Food, Transport and Information.

      Click to access universal_basic_services_-_the_institute_for_global_prosperity_.pdf

      Max and Stacey Keiser

      January 27, 2018 at 3:46 am

    • “Universal Basic Services – an alternative to Universal Basic Income?

      While Universal Basic Income is popular in principle, support for it falls sharply once increases in taxation or reductions in benefits to pay for it are included as this IPSOS Mori survey shows. UCL’s Institute for Global Prosperity has just published a report, proposing what they call Universal Basic Services as a less costly alternative.

      The first point to make about their proposals is that only some of them are truly universal, with others targeted at the lowest two deciles. The Royal Society of Arts, who have their own Basic Income model, have already criticised it.

      The Universal Basic Services proposal concentrates on four areas:

      Shelter,

      Food,

      Communications,

      and Transport.

      Shelter

      They propose building 1.5 million new social housing units over seven years, funded by selling long-term Gilts. This is not really contentious, but they then advocate allocating them on the basis of need to people at nil rent and Council Tax and with an allowance for utilities costs. Potentially, there is a problem of inequity here with existing Council tenants who are paying rent, Council Tax and utility bills while receiving Housing Benefit and this does not seem to have been fully worked out in the proposals – they only look at overall costs.
      Food

      Recognising the undesirability of expecting people in need to rely on charity-run food banks for food, they look at various options including a full community food programme, something we have only previously had in wartime as British Restaurants. While this may be a good idea in terms of ensuring that everyone receives at least one good meal a day, I suspect that the association with the rationing of World War 2 and afterwards may make it politically difficult to achieve.
      Communications

      They propose providing everyone with a free TV licence, basic telephone package and broadband. This has advantages in that no-one would be excluded from the digital economy and that there would be savings for the BBC in not having to collect licence fees, or to pursue non-payers. They estimate the cost at £15-20bn per year.
      Transport

      They suggest either free local bus services for everyone, or free local buses, trains, trams etc. The latter is more suitable for large conurbations like London, but even there we should not underestimate the value of free bus services alone. Many of the poorest workers in London are users of bus services because they are cheaper than the Tube and they would particularly benefit from these being free. Another advantage is that free bus services will increase uptake and this will particularly benefit villages where buses at present are infrequent. They estimate a cost of £5-10bn per year.

      To summarise, I think that their ideas on Communications and Transport are well worth looking at, but new social housing can be built without changing the existing Housing Benefits system, and Basic Income would be better than free food, retaining individual choice rather than a set, and inevitably limited, menu.”

      Not really ideal, better with £s to buy your own food, free choice and all that.

      Max and Stacey Keiser

      January 27, 2018 at 4:00 am

      • In shitty little England we won’t be getting UBI, UBS or XY fucking Z, that’s because this fast becoming third world shithole is the seat of command of Rothschild whose ancestors vowed to bring this country down, all because they were booted out in 1290!Pyshopaths!

        Foxglove

        January 29, 2018 at 6:36 pm

    • This scheme sounds like rather an opposite solution to UBI in many ways, with many of the advantages directly inverted into something dystopian.

      Let’s say your job has been permanently automated away. Under UBI, each month you’d get a lump sum of money, and decide how to spread it out between the things that you care about.

      Under this scheme you’d have the government providing all of your needs for you, in a manner which suits them. You’d very likely have to spend time in government offices, to make sure you qualify, and also, presumably they’d decide to a fair extent what you got to eat. I also think they’d be very likely to have a look at where you’d be travelling, and what you’d been browsing online, given they’re providing these services.

      Perhaps they would decide not to interfere with people’s lives? Well think what the DWP are like. We’d need a similar body to administrate this, and there will always be right-wingers telling them to “get tough”.

      I suppose it could be beneficial if managed with personal liberty always in mind, but it looks to me like it’s handing the government an awful lot of power over individuals, and I see no precedent to suggest they’d use this power to improve lives.

      https://www.theguardian.com/discussion/p/7c5nb

      Max and Stacey Keiser

      January 27, 2018 at 4:22 am

  17. Iain Macwhirter: Carillion and the RBS ‘hang themselves’ memo proves it’s all over for neoliberalism

    WHEN the obituary of neoliberal capitalism is written – as I’m confident it will be within the next decade or so – Royal Bank of Scotland will merit a chapter all on its own. Up to its neck in sub-prime mortgage lending in the US, it was a major figure in the 2007 financial crash, during which its toxic balance sheet was found to be larger than the GDP of the entire UK.

    Then, after RBS had been bailed out with taxpayers’ money, it continued to give capitalism a bad rep, ruthlessly exploiting the small businesses who were suffering from the post-crash recession it had helped create. This was confirmed last week in a revealing internal RBS memo from 2009 which urged managers to let struggling small businesses “hang themselves” so that the bank could pick up their assets at rock bottom. The now notorious RBS Global Restructuring Group was condemned in the Commons last week for “the largest theft anywhere”, and for ruining thousands of viable companies.

    The current RBS chairman, Sir Howard Davies, says that the Public Finance Initiative was a “fraud on the people” and he should know because Royal Bank was one of the biggest names in PFI in the noughties. A National Audit Office report last week confirmed what readers of the Sunday Herald have long known, that the PFI contracts for building and running schools and hospitals are around 40 per cent more expensive than orthodox public procurement. This means around about £200bn in public funds is being diverted to pay for the houses, cars, private schools and investment portfolios of managers and shareholders of the various PFI schemes. Enthusiastically adopted by Tory and Labour governments since the 1990s, these public private partnerships have been revealed as an ingenious scheme for enriching the business elite by diverting money that should have gone into public services.

    No-one should be surprised at this. It is how business has learned to behave in the era of what some have called “turbo-capitalism” – the unregulated, low-tax, bandit capitalism of the last 35 years. A succession of scandals – the Panama Papers, the Paradise Papers, PPI, endowment mortgages, private pensions – has fatally undermined capitalism’s moral claim to be the fairest and most efficient economic system. But the very visibility of these fraudulent activities now constitutes a real and present danger to the future of the capitalist system as we know it.

    Take the privatisation mega-corp, Carillion, which was also heavily involved in PFI and has been one of the leading agents in the “outsourcing” of public services. It has now gone bust putting at risk the welfare of some 40,000 dependent businesses and their employees. Effectively an arm of the state, Carillion represented the most blatant form of toxic collusion between Government and the private sector. The managers of Carillion, who paid themselves inflated salaries and bonuses even when the company was effectively bust, were just doing what comes naturally. Money is its own justification. Most have salted away their fortunes, and moved on – but the public, who paid the price, have not.

    It is not just public sector outsourcing but the entire neoliberal policy – religion almost – of privatisation that has been exposed. Look at the state of the railways in the UK, privatised in the 1990s when it was naively assumed that private capital would, almost by definition, run things better than the state. Utilities like rail, gas, water and electricity, are essentially natural monopolies. State monopolies are often inefficient, but the promises of privatisation have simply not materialised for consumers, as they realise every month when they open their energy bills. Most voters now want utilities such as rail taken fully back into public ownership.

    Capitalists focus relentlessly on the bottom line, so it is ironic that they have signed their own death warrants. But there’s nothing so blind as human avarice. Our degenerate business class seems incapable of understanding why voters are so incensed at their behaviour. They persuade themselves that they are “wealth creators”, when it is patently obvious that they’re simply syphoning off wealth created by society as a whole.

    Some entrepreneurs are arguably wealth creators. For the two centuries following the Industrial Revolution, capitalism was the most innovative and productive economic system in human history, as Karl Marx observed. Even today, capitalists like Elon Musk of Tesla or the late Steve Jobs of Apple, bring great products to market, though in both cases they were heavily underpinned by direct and indirect public investment. But the people manipulating Libor rates in the City, setting up hedge funds, selling sub-prime mortgages, running PFI schemes etc are simply parasites. Britain’s managerial class today is about as entrepreneurial as Homer Simpson. They’re mostly dull-witted accountants who’ve sat on their bottoms for 20 years.

    Even as they were creating the greatest financial crisis in a century, City bankers persuaded themselves that they were worth every penny of their absurd remuneration. They still do, having learned nothing. Neoliberal capitalism has been defined by globalisation and the growth of a plutocratic international elite which has tried to cut itself off from the rest of society. Soft larceny has become an entire management culture. Even university vice chancellors and public sector bureaucrats have taken to paying themselves ridiculous salaries on the grounds that they too must be “worth it”.

    Well, here’s the news: they aren’t, and everyone knows it. These are no captains of industry; they are pirates in suits who’ve been tolerated far too long. The UK economy is in a terrible state, even without Brexit, and wages have been stagnant for over a decade. The housing market, which is both a consequence and a cause of gross inequality, is a national disgrace. It has become a Ponzi scheme to enrich the lenders by bidding up the price of housing while artificially restricting supply. London property has meanwhile become a bricks-and-mortar bank in which the management plutocrats stash much of their loot.

    The beneficiaries of this kleptocratic capitalism are hiding in plain sight. And I believe their time is nearly up. In the 19th century, plutocrats could protect their wealth behind laws largely drawn up for the benefit of the wealthy. The poor had no lawyers. But today the poor have the vote, and lawyers, and there is no way this kind of structural inequality can survive in the 21st century, short of the extinction of popular democracy. Eventually, people will vote for change: for a society in which wealth is spread more equitably, and in which public services are run in the interest of the people who pay for them.

    I don’t know if Jeremy Corbyn is going to be the agent of this change; I suspect he is too old. But behind lies an entire generation of educated young people who have no stake in the system as it stands. Their parents accepted regulated, post-war capitalism because it offered them secure jobs, pensions, cheap houses, free higher education. Millennials have seen all that swept away as corporate capitalism’s thirst for profit became insatiable. They will be the grave-diggers of the system, and while it may take a decade or so to be buried, this era of capitalism is already a dead parrot.

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/15886303.Iain_Macwhirter__RIP_capitalism_____millennials_will_dig_your_grave/

    The Herald

    January 27, 2018 at 12:24 pm

  18. DWP refuses to pay out on half of emergency claims

    FEWER than half of requests for emergency benefit payments were met by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) in the latest year for which figures are available, veteran Labour MP Frank Field said today.

    https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/dwp-refuses-to-pay-out-on-half-of-emergency-claims

    ken

    January 29, 2018 at 9:59 am

  19. This looks ominous,

    Andrew Coates

    January 29, 2018 at 4:50 pm

    • “It might all look pretty sensible. But the SSAC – whose job is to spot problems in new welfare laws – has raised three big problems.

      Number one: to chip away at a surplus, some people will have to put in a claim every month for UC – knowing full well they won’t get it.

      That’s for the situation we just explained above. So it’s if you have one really good month, suddenly have a surplus, and have to chip away at it.

      Number two: other people, seasonal workers for example, could actually be better off if they DON’T reapply every month.

      Say you have a summer job with a big payoff in June, July and August, but terrible pay the rest of the year.

      You could come off UC in June, not bother reapplying in July and August, and then when you re-claim in September, you won’t have too many surplus earnings to take into account.

      Number three, and this is the biggest one. The SSAC says this whole policy is just way too complicated.”

      Andrew Coates

      January 29, 2018 at 4:52 pm

      • Yes, make the changes more complicated for claimants, this will save even more money.

        whoknew

        January 29, 2018 at 5:31 pm

  20. …And spend even more lives…

    Violet

    January 29, 2018 at 5:34 pm

  21. Esther McVey is at it! On BBC News it has be reported that avery single person – all 1.3 million of them – on the main disability benefit is to have their claim reviewed, no doubt to try to drive as many as possible off it onto Jobseeker’s Allowance or whatever.

    Didn’t take her long did it?.

    Jim

    January 29, 2018 at 6:00 pm

    • Whoops! The reviews are taking place because of a court ruling AGAINST the government, so it might be a case of Esther wiping egg off her face rather than cracking the whip.

      Jim

      January 29, 2018 at 6:03 pm

  22. well it looks like i am in the jcp void of nothingness as went to my booked time to sign on and was early as always and the guy was dealing with another person b4 me giving the full BS that they need access to there ujm account or else ect ect guy was like ok no problem and will tick the box to give them access signed and left.

    he took one look at me logged off the system and basically buggers off to the staff area so sat there another 10 mins and g4s said hew was i here to see and said there name and was told he was not here today pmsl.

    i said he was just here did you not see me walk in the office now 20 mins ago or you forgot i was here as well some security you are maybe if you stop looking out the window all day you might see what is going on.

    another adviser now calls me over to sign and check my work search and says hew is my adviser i said take ur pick checks the system and i am on no ones case load and cant be assigned one on the system only new appointments to sign on can be entered and just looked bemused.

    seems like they are treating me like a hand grenade with the pin removed atm to hot to handle in case it explodes in there face again 😉

    superted

    January 29, 2018 at 8:40 pm

    • superted

      I’m getting the feeling there’s not a lot of love for you at the old Jobcentre! The g4s guy at my JC just sits there playing with his phone.

      jj joop

      January 30, 2018 at 12:35 pm

  23. ‘People here don’t know enough about Universal Credit – they are freaking out’

    Some people are preparing to go for weeks without any money

    it will replace six existing types of benefit and is designed, say the Government, to give people more autonomy over their finances.

    But many face uncertainty and potentially a long wait for payments, which could then put them in arrears. One woman in Cinderford, where the system is already in place, said she is facing court action for being £1,000 in rent arrears while waiting for the first payment.

    http://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/gloucester-news/people-here-dont-know-enough-1118958

    ken

    January 29, 2018 at 10:58 pm

  24. Fermanagh and Omagh Council wrote to Prime Minister asking for halt to universal credit roll out

    the UK’s former Minister for Employment Damian Hinds told the Council that Universal Credit “is already delivering big improvements to people’s lives, with more people finding work, spending longer looking for work and taking up jobs they would not have previously considered.”
    He said: “If we stopped the roll out, this would deny people the real improvement that Universal Credit is delivering.”

    http://www.impartialreporter.com/news/15904626.Council_wrote_to_Prime_Minister_asking_for_halt_to_universal_credit_roll_out/

    ken

    January 29, 2018 at 11:00 pm

  25. Well known already but many in their own bubbles haven’t a clue, yet.

    A third of the UK’s poorest households are skipping meals because they cannot afford to put food on the table, according to a survey that highlights the extent to which austerity and rising food prices are driving “hidden hunger”.

    Groups worst hit by benefit cuts and freezes, such as unemployed people and families with three or more children, were most likely to suffer food insecurity,

    Unemployed people were most at risk: 36% said they had skipped meals, compared with 12% of those in work, 31% were worried about having insufficient food and 25% said they had gone 24 hours without eating at some point over the past 12 months.

    https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/jan/30/food-insecurity-a-third-of-poorest-households-skip-meals-survey-finds

    whoknew

    January 30, 2018 at 9:08 am

  26. Regarding the 1.6m disability benefit claims after High Court ruling

    a process it estimated would cost £3.7 billion and take years to complete.

    “We are working with stakeholders to change the PIP assessment guide so that we can implement the judgment.

    “Once we have completed this exercise we will be carrying out an administrative exercise to review cases that may be eligible and ensure that claimants receive the correct award.”

    You know what the above means.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/government-review-16m-disability-benefit-claims-personal-independence-payment-pip-high-court-ruling-a8184381.html

    whoknew

    January 30, 2018 at 9:22 am

  27. Job promoter joins with DWP after Carillion collapse

    Solihull-based Energy & Utility Skills has confirmed it is working with the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP) to offer support to employees, contractors and apprentices potentially affected by the fallout from collapse of Carillion.

    https://www.insidermedia.com/insider/midlands/job-promoter-joins-with-dwp-after-carillion-collapse

    ken

    January 30, 2018 at 9:32 am

    • Thanks. This is exactly the kind of thing that needs investigating!

      Andrew Coates

      January 30, 2018 at 11:35 am

  28. Universal Credit roll out in Darlington: Concerns over evictions, mental health, crime

    A CONSERVATIVE councillor has launched a blistering attack on the Universal Credit system, which is due to be rolled out in Darlington in June.

    Alan Coulthas warned that the long delays in the system could see people going into arrears, debt and homelessness.

    http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/local/darlington/15905082.Universal_Credit_roll_out_in_Darlington__Concerns_over_evictions__mental_health__crime/

    ken

    January 30, 2018 at 9:38 am

  29. ‘I was sanctioned for going to a funeral’

    The universal credit system could leave up to one million people exposed to benefits sanctions once fully rolled out, the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme has been told.

    Dr David Webster, from the University of Glasgow, estimates that up to 350,000 people a year are currently facing benefits sanctions in the UK, but he says that once the universal credit system is implemented, one million people in low-paid work will be exposed to benefit sanctions.

    One man says he has already had his benefits heavily cut after he missed a job centre appointment because he was attending a funeral.

    http://novafm.co.uk/2018/01/30/i-was-sanctioned-for-going-to-a-funeral/

    ken

    January 30, 2018 at 9:44 am


Comments are closed.