Social Fund Localisation.
Not in the Queen’s Speech ‘Family-Friendly Agenda’.
“Inclusion’s Centre for Responsible Credit is currently researching local authority plans to implement the localisation of elements of the Social Fund from April 2013. The Social Fund provides on-off financial support for low income households for a number of emergency expenses.
From April 2013, the government will abolish the existing Social Fund scheme. The current levels of expenditure on Community Care Grants and Crisis Loans Social Fund elements will be paid as non-ringfenced grants to upper tier local authorities and to the Scottish and Welsh Assembly government.
Community Care Grants currently support people with disabilities, lone parents and those at risk or moving out of institutional care. Crisis Loans tend to go to the long-term unemployed. We are keen to obtain views on current thinking about the local models of delivery which will be put in place to support vulnerable groups once budgets are devolved. “(From Here)
For “non-ringfenced” read, up to the Local Council to decide.
So essential money for those in desperate need is to be allocated according to the decisions of Councillors, advised by their officers.
We can imagine that, for example, Westminster Council, keen to get rid of its poor (and already cleansing them to out of London housing), will not be exactly forthcoming.
|Andrew Coates on Sanctions, Should We Film the…|
|Andrew Coates on Ipswich JobCentre Goes Compute…|
|gaia on Ipswich JobCentre Goes Compute…|
|gaia on Sanctions, Should We Film the…|
|Ed on Ipswich JobCentre Goes Compute…|
- 741,744 hits
- NegativityI was brought up to believe that the worst thing you could ever call anybody was a liar. Even when they clearly were. Even when it was Iain Duncan Smith. But (I'm sorry, Mum) I have to say it. Esther McVey lied today in the Mail and the Express. Since the quote is the same in both I have to assume that it's her lie, not the papers'. […]
- The list of shame: Court tells DWP to reveal workfare users“It is to be expected that some charities find it difficult if not impossible to defend themselves against the actions of Boycott Workfare.” – Upper Tribunal Judge Wikeley (reaffirming the First Tier Tribunal decision) The DWP has lost its appeal to try and keep the list of those using workfare out of the public domain. The […]
- Part of an organisation? Pledge to Boycott WorkfareThe government continues to try and push workfare with numerous work for benefits schemes in spite of a groundswell of opposition across the UK. Already nearly 400 voluntary sector organisations have pledged to Keep Volunteering Voluntary, and over 20 councils have pledged to avoid workfare too. It’s important that other sectors also firmly turn their […] […]
- Ipswich JobCentre Goes Computers and Rips out Public Phones.
- Sanctions, Should We Film the Process? Video example.
- Dying Penniless and Alone: the Reality of DWP ‘sanctions’. Fight Back!
- Unemployment and Welfare Blogs, Updates.
- Is it Compulsory to Register with Universal Jobmatch? What Evidence of Jobsearch do we have to provide?
- Oakley Sanctions Report – DWP, all we need is better “communication”.